Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow The bare facts arrow Contents arrow Prelude to GHZ
Prelude to GHZ Print
The bare facts

Let's play a game. Here are the rules:

  • There are two opponent teams: the "players" (Andy, Bob, and Charles) versus the "interrogators."
  • Each player is asked either "What is the value of X" or "What is the value of Y?"
  • Only two answers are allowed: +1 or –1.
  • Either all players are asked the first question (about the value of X), or one player is asked the first question and two players are asked the second question (about the value of Y).
  • The players win if the product of their answers is –1 in case everyone is asked the first question, and if the product of their answers is +1 in the case that Y-questions are asked. Otherwise they loose.
  • The players are not allowed to communicate which each other once the questions have been asked. Before that, they are permitted to work out a strategy.

Is there a failsafe strategy? Can the players make sure that they will win?

 

RFA image

Caustic IV by Eric J. Heller.

 

Let us try pre-agreed answers. Let's call them XA, XB, XC and YA, YB, YC. The winning combinations satisfy the following equations:

XA YB YC = +1
YA XB YC = +1,
YA YB XC = +1,
XA XB XC = –1.

The product of the left-hand sides of the first three equations equals XA XB XC. (Remember, the possible values are +1 and –1.) The product of the right-hand sides of these three equations equals +1, implying that XA XB XC = +1. But if this holds, then the fourth equation obviously cannot hold.

The bottom line: there is no failsafe strategy with pre-agreed answers.

This game has been adapted from L. Vaidman, "Variations on the theme of the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger proof," Foundations of Physics 29, 615–30 (1999).

Please read this next.

 
< Prev   Next >
Registration is essentially an expression of your appreciation. It also allows you to contact me.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Who's Online