Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Discussion arrow Contents arrow A harvest of questions
A harvest of questions Print
Discussion, first conclusions, interpretational strategy

A round-up of questions arising from The bare facts ...

Resonance Fine Art

Correspondence by Eric J. Heller. This image is a Rosetta Stone translating between classical and quantum. Quantum standing waves are blue, classical trajectories are red. There are four types of classical motion for this lemon-shaped billiard, including the chaotic motion seen in the lower right. The correspondence between the wave mechanics and the classical mechanics can be read off the images.

 

Questions arising from Two simple rules:

  • Why is the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics — first of all, whatever else it may be — a probability algorithm?
  • Why does it assign probabilities to measurement outcomes?
  • Why does it need complex numbers?
  • Why are there two fundamental rules?

Question arising from A scattering event:

The upshot of this article was that under the conditions stipulated by Rule B — that is, if nothing indicates which outgoing particle is identical with which incoming particle — it is not the case that either of the alternatives takes place. The question "Which outgoing particle is identical with which incoming particle?" has no answer. This does not mean that we don't know the answer. The very assumption that there is an answer is inconsistent with the well-tested laws of quantum mechanics. There is no answer.

  • What does this tell us about the "ultimate" constituents of matter?

Questions arising from The most beautiful experiment:

The upshot of this article was that under the conditions stipulated by Rule B — there is nothing, no event, no state of affairs, anywhere, anytime, from which the slit taken by an electron can be inferred — the following statements cannot both be true:

  • Each electron goes through a single slit — either L or R.
  • The behavior of an electron going through, say, the left slit does not depend on whether the right slit is open or shut.

Hence if it is true that each electron goes through a single slit, then the behavior of an electron that goes through, say, the left slit does depend on whether the right slit is open or shut.

  • How can the condition of the right slit (open or shut) affect the behavior of an electron that goes through the left slit?

If it is not the case that each electron goes through a single slit, then in some sense it goes through both slits.

  • In what sense?
  • And if it is possible for an electron to go simultaneously through both slits, what does this tell us about the nature of physical space?

Questions arising from Bell's theorem:

The implication of Bell's theorem is as simple as it is profound. Measurements cannot, in general, be interpreted as simply revealing properties or values that would also be possessed if they were not measured. The measurements discussed in this article do not reveal pre-existent properties. They create their outcomes.

  • Then how it is that the colors differ whenever identical measurements are performed?
  • How does one apparatus "know" about the outcome obtained by the other apparatus?
  • What kind of mechanism is responsible for the correlations between the measurement outcomes?



 
Next >
Registration is essentially an expression of your appreciation. It also allows you to contact me.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Who's Online

We have 2 guests online